 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Haringey
Stop the War Coalition |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| What
you can do |
- Join
the national demonstration on 19 March 2005.
- Come
to local protests and public meetings
and bring your friends, neighbours and colleagues.
- Tell
everybody to protest against the continuing war on the Iraqi people. Take
the national Stop the War Coalition End the occupation petition
around your friends, family and workmates.
Ask everyone who signs to do the same.
- Spread
the word by any practical means you can. Put
a poster in your window to let your neighbours
know what you think.
Wear a End the Occupation badge, add text such as Demonstrate
for peace on 19 March to your email signature. Keep an eye on the national
Stop the War Coalition
website - www.stopwar.org.uk - for the latest news and developments
in the campaign.
- Join
our mailing list to
get regular updates on anti-war activity in Haringey. Join your local group.
If there isn't one, talk to us about getting one started. The increasing threat
of war means that lots of people will want to get involved. Set up a stall
in the high street. Leaflet a tube station. Ask others to join in. Lets form
a human chain of activity culminating in the next national demonstration.
- Keep
the pressure up on Tony Blair and other politicians. Write a letter
to your local MP (see below). Mailbags in Westminster are full of letters
against the war. Be the straw that breaks Blair's resolve. Every bit helps.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tell
the politicians what you think |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Write to Tony Blair
or to the Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, at the House of Commons, London
SW1.
- Write to your MP.
In Haringey that’s Barbara Roche for Hornsey and Wood Green, David Lammy for
Tottenham. See www.FaxYourMP.com
for how to send a fax to your MP (whoever s/he is) over the internet – it’s
very easy. Or email lammyd or
rocheb@parliament.uk.
- Visit your MP’s ‘surgery’
for constituents. You can see Barbara Roche at Wood Green Library, 10am to
noon on Saturday 3 November and every 2 weeks at the same place and time.
- Write to newspapers
- national and local
- That also makes the
politicians think. Letters of only 2 or 3 sentences are the most likely
to get published, so it need not take long.
- Phone a TV channel
or radio station
- Object to biased
or unfair coverage of the war and of people’s views about it. Use phone-in
programmes. Also phone to support and encourage reporters you think are
taking the right line.
- Be
polite – heavy sarcasm or insults will make a politician or editor more
likely to bin it.
- Be
brief – editors rarely publish more than 250 words.
- Be
patient – if your own letter didn’t get published, it still might have
helped to persuade the editor to publish one out of many letters against the
war – they count the letters on different topics a bit like votes.
- Be
original – if you have access to some source of information that most
people don’t, like foreign newspapers or what you learnt from Asian relatives
or business contacts, use it.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Some
arguments you may want to use |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- If the US wants to
get rid of Saddam Hussein, why did they (a) put him there and (b) allow
him to keep control of the country at the end of the Gulf War last time? Why
did they call on the Kurds and Marsh Arabs to rise up and then allow Saddam
to suppress them? Was it just a cynical ploy to exploit and demoralise domestic
opposition to Saddam?
- If the US does
remove Saddam, will they purge the state apparatus, or use them to
police and control Iraq? Will Saddam's henchmen be torturing people in the
name of the US's appointee in a couple of years time? What is the longterm
plan? Is there one?
- If Iraq did have
weapons of mass destruction, like North Korea, would the US be attacking it?
Isn't the difference OIL?
- Iraq has been devastated
by war. 100,000 people died in the Gulf War in 1991. The World Health
Organisation say that by 1997 at least 1 million people, including 500,000
children, had died in the aftermath as a result of sanctions. Bombing still
continues, mostly unreported, as US and British planes over-fly the no
fly zones imposed at the end of the war.
- British Gulf
war veterans are dying at a rate of 2 a week. Aren't British soldiers
being used in a filthy war in the US's interests?
- Scott Ritter,
the USs chief weapons inspector, and Denis Halliday, the UN High
Commissioner, have both resigned saying that the weapons inspection was just
an excuse to keep up the rogue state threat of Iraq and to justify
the sanctions and bombing. Are they right?
- What happened
to Blair's promise to restrain Bush? Around
the world, Britain is being seen as a loyal appeaser of the US military machine.
Blair is making Britons into terrorist targets.
- Why has Britain been
deporting Iraqis and Iraqi Kurds? Why are they now denying them benefits
and support? Doesn't this challenge the supposedly humanitarian aims of the
mission?
- The war has already cost
more innocent civilian lives directly by bombing than died on 9/11. Moreover
as the war continues, many Afghans are dying of starvation, cold and
disease, possibly hundreds of times the number killed in the 11 September
attacks on America. One atrocity does not justify another.
- Just as in the Gulf
War, ‘surgical
strikes’ against military targets are making disastrous and cruel mistakes
– a village, a refugee convoy, a Red Cross food warehouse, a UN mine clearance
team.
- Why,
when Milosevic, Pinochet and numerous Nazis were brought to trial,
is it considered appropriate to hunt and destroy Bin Laden and the Taliban
leaders? Isn’t this a racist double standard – international law for whites
but bombing for Afghans and Arabs?
- The more killing
and destruction the US and UK do in Afghanistan, the greater the chances
of serious retaliation against civilians in the UK. True security means
having fewer enemies. The war is just making more enemies for the UK’s people,
without bringing anyone nearer to justice for the attacks on America.
- The US – and Blair its
ally – seems to be assuming a God-given right to tell the Afghans who
should be their government. Is this democracy or imperialism?
- What’s the alternative?
There is a need for lots of debate here, but key issues are:-
- Bombing should stop
NOW. Ground troops should be withdrawn and aid must be sent, without strings.
The US and Britain have promised less than 1/200th of the cost of bombing
Afghanistan in aid to Karzais government!
- Aid agencies need
support for food delivery, and refugees should be supported whether they
wish to return home or flee the country.
- Politicians should
stop blaming refugees trying to get to the UK for fleeing the wars the
same politicians supported.
- What sort of international
aid effort can help rebuild an economy and civil society in Afghanistan,
as a pre-condition of peace, democracy and human rights (especially for
Afghan women)?
- What can be done
to end the causes of fundamentalist discontent – which is basically a
reaction to imperialism and poverty?
- Especially, what
can UK politicians do to secure justice for Palestinians?
- The war should not
become an excuse for undermining democracy in the UK itself – nor
for undermining the right to claim asylum. Even before 11 September, the Terrorism
Act 2000 gave the government excessive powers to ban organisations, criminalise
certain international solidarity actions and criminalise political protest.
Since then, proposals for new legislation and a new European directive about
anti-terrorist measures will make things even worse. Ask your MP to oppose
these measures NOW.
- Why did a supposedly
humanitarian mission in Somalia turn into a disaster?
Why did US special forces try to seize General Aideed, who was a US enemy
at the time, and why is the US now relying on intelligence supplied
by his son?]
 |
 |
 |
 |
September
11th families & survivors |
 |
 |
 |
 |
“The day of my brother’s memorial service, the bombing started, which made it
harder ... I didn’t want to see any more victims of September 11th [I want] fundamental
changes in a world where things like this can happen” - Ryan Amundson, brother
of Craig Amundson, who was killed in the Pentagon on September 11th
“I don’t think patriotism means accepting the actions of your leaders. [It means]
caring about the principles of democracy and caring about the people of your country”
- Ryan Amundson
“What we need less of is war rhetoric and war against Afghanistan in particular,
and to explore the possibility of a judicial solution. In the short term, the
first priority should be to hunt down and arrest the criminals with the goal of
achieving justice, not revenge. This is a task left not to the military but to
investigative police forces, who can prepare for a trial. The last thing I wanted
was for more widows and fatherless children to be created in my name. It would
only produce a backlash. As the victim of violence, I’d never want this to happen
to another woman again” - Professor Robin Theurkauf, whose husband Tom was
killed in the World Trade Centre on September 11th
“There is no heroism in bombing innocent civilians. So many people, especially
politicians, seemed so keen to get angry on our behalf. It seemed the only people
not in rage were the families of the victims. We had too much grief to cope with
for that” - Rita Lasar, whose brother was killed in the World Trade Centre
on September 11th
“Let’s put all the politics aside. What really matters is human beings and taking
care of each other” - Kelly Campbell, whose brother-in-law Craig Scott Amundson
was killed in the Pentagon on September 11th
“A European demining expert in Kabul who works closely with the Pentagon reckons
that up to 8,000 civilians have been killed ... Professor Marc Herold, of the
University of New Hampshire, puts the number of civilian casualties at at least
4,000” - The Guardian, February 12th, 2002
“This has been the most accurate war ever fought in this nation’s history” - General
Tommy Franks, US Afghan campaign commander
“In fact, [the rate of civilians killed per bomb dropped] was far higher in the
Afghanistan conflict - perhaps four times higher - than in the 1999 Balkans war”
- Carl Conetta, Commonwealth Institute
“What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties - 3,767 civilian
deaths in eight and a half weeks? ... The critical element remains the very
low value put upon Afghan civilian lives by US military planners... as clearly
revealed by US willingness to bomb heavily populated regions” - Professor
Marc Herold, University of New Hampshire, in the first major study of Afghan casualties
“Undoubtedly there have been civilian casualties. No one is doing a real assessment
of that. It gets very political. Please don’t ask me about that” - Afghan
NGO worker (NGO mostly funded by US government)
“A lot of civilians have been killed or injured. It’s definitely in the four figures”
- UN source, quoted in The Guardian
February 12th
“Despite US radio broadcasts in local languages, many Afghans have no clear idea
of why they are under attack” - Professor Marc Herold, University of New
Hampshire
“I and all my classmates are very sad because of the situation in our homeland.
When our teacher said in the class that many people have been killed in Afghanistan,
I and my classmates started weeping because everyone has relatives there. I expect
America not to kill the poor Afghans. They are hungry and poor” - Feriba,
a young Afghan girl
“If they are not al-Qaida, they’re the people who supported al-Qaida. They should
be bombed just frighten them” Kabul’s new security chief, - General Basir
Salangi of the Northern Alliance
“Medecins Sans Frontieres increasingly sees evidence of unacceptably high numbers
of Afghan civilian casualties from the military operations” - Statement of
Medecins Sans Frontieres
“Fortunately for us, the civilian victims of America’s B52s will remain unknown
in their newly dug graves. Even before the war ended, around 3,700 of them ...
had been ripped to pieces in our War for Civilization” - Robert Fisk, Britain’s
leading expert on Middle Eastern affairs and corespondent on the region for 20
years
“Some analysts say more than 60 Afghan civilians are being killed daily on average
since the bombing began on October 7. A European demining expert in Kabul who
works closely with the Pentagon reckons that up to 8,000 civilians have been killed”
- The Guardian, 12/2/2002
 |
 |
 |
 |
Opportunism
in the face of tragedy |
 |
 |
 |
 |
“For the foreseeable future, much of the world will understandably be focused
on efforts to bring those responsible for the attacks of September 11th to justice.
In the meantime, some governments may cynically try to take advantage of this
struggle to justify or intensify their own crackdowns on political opponents or
religious groups” - Human Rights Watch
“China ... has reasons to ask the United States to give its support and understanding
in the fight against terrorism and separatists ... Opposing East Turkestan terrorism
is also a component part of the international community’s struggle against terrorism”
- Chinese foreign ministry spokesmen
“Egyptian Prime Minister Atef Abeid lashed out at human rights groups for ‘calling
on us to give these terrorists their “human rights”’, referring to documented
reports of torture and unfair trials ... ‘Maybe Western countries should begin
to think of Egypt’s own fight against terror as their new model’ - Human
Rights Watch
“On September 13, Defense Minister Peter Reith cited the attacks in the United
States to justify his government’s effort to prevent asylum-seekers entering Australia”
- Human Rights Watch
“Bin Laden’s people are connected with the events currently taking place in our
Chechnya ... Our American partners cannot but be concerned about this circumstance.
So we have a common foe” - Vladimir Putin, President of Russia
“As for the corespondents, we would like them to know that we agree with US President
Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbours or defends terrorists is himself
a terrorist. We, too, will not make any difference between terrorists and their
friends and supporters” - Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe
“It is a fact that we have killed 14 Palestinians in Jenin, Kabatyeh and Tammum,
with the world remaining absolutely silent!” - Benyamin Ben Elizier, Israeli
Defence Minister, September 14th
 |
 |
 |
 |
Were
Negotiations Possible? |
 |
 |
 |
 |
“When I said no negotiations, I meant no negotiations” - President George
W. Bush, October 15th 2001
“A senior Taliban leader said Sunday that Afghanistan would be willing to hand
over Osama bin Laden to a third country if the United States halted its bombing
campaign. ‘But President George W. Bush pointedly rejected the Taliban offer”
- International Herald Tribune, front page, October 15th
Stop
the War Coalition: national Stop the War website. This has a list of
contact addresses for national newspapers here.
Media Workers Against the
War: Critical journalists’ website.
Znet Magazine:
US-based alternative media site with massive archive of anti-war articles and
more.
Fax Your MP:
Tells you how to fax your MP and does it for you on the internet. Write your
letter first, enter the site and paste your letter in.
Revolutionary Afghan Women's
Association: See this for why the bombing should stop, what’s wrong
with the Northern Alliance as well as the Taliban, and also for the situation
of refugees and Afghan women.
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament:
The UKs most well-known and best-respected campaign for peace and nuclear
disarmament.
Terrorism Act 2000:
Anti-terrorism laws and what’s wrong with them.
Transcend: US-based
anti-war site.
Peaceful Tomorrows:
September 11th survivors site for peace and justice.
Email
the webmaster with any suggestions or criticisms about this page.