 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Haringey
Stop the War Coalition |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Stop the War
on the Iraqi people! |
IT'S
TIME TO END THIS WAR
More
than two thirds of British people say we should bring our troops home. It's
time to end this war.
What
went wrong?
Basic
water and electricity supplies are erratic or non-existent in Baghdad and Basra -
at 57 and 60°C, two of the hottest cities in the world this summer -
because contracts have been handed out to US corporations. Troops shoot to kill.
And the new colonial overlords of Iraq are constructing a "democracy", without
any elections, consisting of a government whose appointees have not stepped
foot in Iraq in the last twenty years.
As a result, in April, the only serious opinon opinion poll carried out
in Iraq (by the out-going CPA) found that 92% of Iraqis said that the Americans
were an occupying army.
With such opposition, democracy will never give the Americans what they want.
So instead they plan to run fake elections and to suppress the resistance, in
what will become a bloodier and bloodier conflict.
Before the
war we argued that this war would be a disaster for the people of Iraq. We were
proved right. We also said something else. That this war would be fought
for the oil of Iraq and therefore real democracy could never be contemplated
in Iraq. The reason was, and is, devastatingly simple. The first act of
a real democracy would be to nationalise the oil fields in order to raise revenue
to rebuild the country. If that happened the US would lose its prize assets
and the process of liberation would inspire democracy across the Arab world,
just as the USSR's retreat from Eastern Europe in 1989 opened the floodgates
for revolutions against the old regimes. The US simply could not afford to let
this nightmare scenario happen.
Tony Lied
Tony Blair lied to the people of Britain in order to get his way. His evidence
at the Hutton Inquiry contradicts what he said to Parliament, ie. that there
was an imminent threat from Saddam Hussein.
He lied
when he said that this was a war:
| 1. |
|
To
stop Saddam using Weapons of Mass Destruction. MI6 believed that Saddam
was not a threat, but participated in misleading Parliament in order to
go to war. |
|
| 2. |
To
liberate Iraqis. Why are the troops still in Iraq after Saddam fell?
Why is Britain still persecuting Iraqi asylum seekers? Why have Kurds now
joined the resistance? |
|
| 3. |
To
end the suffering of the Iraqis under sanctions. For 12 years, US and
UK governments vetoed 50% of food and medicines under the UN Oil-for-Food
Programme. Result: Iraqis had to live on 50 cents a day, which the WHO say
lead to the deaths of 1m people between 1991 and 1997 (no figures were released
after that). Bush and Blair could have ended the suffering without war -
they were the principal cause of it. |
|
| 4. |
To
bring democracy to the Arab world. |
Blair
is facing his Wargate. But Watergate was about
burglary. Wargate is about war. Blair and Bush lied to go to war and are responsible
for the deaths of thousands. By staying in Iraq they are perpetuating the crime.
The only grain of truth Blair uttered was when he whispered there would be "regime
change". But a regime imposed by the USA and harnessed to the needs of
multinational oil companies, rather than Iraqis, would be a regime at war with
its own people. This is what is happening. The occupation is unravelling faster
than expected because of two factors. First, the police force and the Republican
Guard collapsed, leaving troops to police the cities. Second, the billions spent
on the war omitted to ensure a rapid, practical, relief effort.
Tony Blair also lied to soldiers and their families. He told them that
soldiers would be welcomed with open arms and would be home in weeks. Instead,
they have been left to rot between a rock and a hard place, enforcing a military
dictatorship over the Iraqi people and being fired at by Iraqis trying to free
their country. Soldiers from the 1991 Gulf War have been dying from Gulf War
Syndrome at a rate of 2 a week, ignored by the MOD. Is this fate in store for
veterans of this Iraq War?
Soldiers are dying in their hundreds. Iraqis are dying in their thousands. The
British medical journal, The Lancet, reports a survey which
puts the figure at around 100,000 directly from violent death - bullets, bombs,
falling masonry - alone.
An independent Iraqi NGO carried out a careful 'census' which calculated that
at least 35,000 Iraqis (soldiers and civilians) had been killed by the invading
armies. Iraqbodycount reported this summer that there were over 20,000 Iraqis
with major injuries. US hospitals report thousands of injured US soldiers, more
than the military hospitals can cope with.
How
to end this disaster
The
only way to end this disaster is to hand Iraq back to the Iraqis and to pull
all the troops out now. We should be supplying aid, and giving Iraqis the
resources to rebuild their country, not trying to impose a new dictatorship
and pumping out the spoils of war. Aid without strings is the only kind of foreign
intervention the Iraqis need.
The $500bn US military machine will not pull back willingly. The
hawks in the White House and Pentagon will only retreat when the cost of staying
is greater than the cost of leaving. Two factors can make this happen.
| 1. |
|
The
opposition to the occupation in Iraq. The massive weekly demonstrations
in the cities. The shooting of individual soldiers, the sabotage and the
ambushing of convoys. |
| |
| 2. |
The
anti-war movement in the colonial countries and around the world. Our
task in Britain is to build the opposition to the ongoing war and occupation
in the UK. That is why national demonstrations are so important. |
Talk
to your friends, neighbours and workmates and get them to come on the demonstration
on 19 March to say Troops Out and Bush Out. Join the stalls leafletting and
petitioning in the high street. Get in contact: email haringey@stopwar.org.uk.
Following
the 15 February 2003 demonstration, when 2 million people marched in Central
London, the anti-war movement did not disappear.
When war broke out on March 19th, over 1,000 school kids and over a hundred
adults demonstrated in Haringey. There were protests at CONEL in Tottenham
and Finsbury Park station, in Crouch End, Wood Green and Muswell Hill. Many
Haringey residents protested with their workmates in Central London and marched
to Parliament in the evening.
On March
22nd, up to 750,000 people demonstrated: the second biggest demonstration
in British history was organised in under a week, in the face of a hostile
media.
On March 29th, we organised a
local demonstration through Haringey which pulled 500 people - the
largest local demonstration since the Poll Tax.
On April
12th, as we were told the war was over, 250,000 demonstrated: the second
biggest demonstration ever in Britain during wartime.
The size
of our demonstrations directly affects the confidence of millions to stand up
against this war. Join the protests. Help us build the movement. Stop Bush's
"war on terrorism", which will only bring more terror around the world.
 |
 |
 |
 |
EVENTS
& ACTIVITY ALL
WELCOME |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Local public meetings
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stalls
on Saturdays
Crouch End Broadway Town
Hall, 11.30am-1.00pm
Muswell Hill Barclay's
Bank, 11.00am-1.00pm
Stroud Green Londis,
11.00am-3pm
Wood Green Boot's,
High Road, 2-4.30pm
Other stalls may be up and running
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
News
 |
 |
 |
 |
EUROPEAN
SOCIAL FORUM
alexandra palace
bloomsbury 15-17
october
WHY
YOU SHOULD GO TO THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FORUM
The European Social Forum (ESF) is a giant gathering of people
from across Europe against war and privatisation. It is the next
stop for the European peace and anti-war movements. The Florence
ESF in 2002 was the launchpad for the global day of action against
war on 15 Feb 2003. That day has gone down in history.
The London ESF is taking place on our doorstep, in Alexandra Palace,
two weeks before the US election. It will be a chance to show the
world what we feel about Bush's warmongering policies and the support
he has had from Blair. And it is an opportunity to discuss the big
issues for our movement with anti war activists from around the
world.
From Friday morning to the demo on Sunday at 1pm there will be a
host of international forums, rallies and debates on war including:
End the occupation of Iraq - What future for Palestine? -
Strategies for peace and disarmament - The Hijab and islamaphobia
- The faultine in British politics - US imperialism and the
elections - The struggle for democracy in the Middle East -
and much more. Speakers include Lindsey German, Kate Hudson, Anas
Altikriti, Tony Benn, Ahmed Ben Bella, Rose Gentle and George Galloway.
An
ESF pass for all events costs £30/£20. To pay, go online
to www.fse-esf.org,
call 020 7833 8440 or email ukesfoffice@gn.apc.org.
For local information, speakers, leaflets etc. call 07803 167266
or haringeyesf@stopwar.org.uk
|
another
world is possible |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  |
 |
 |
March 29th 2003 Haringey
Demo 500+ DEMONSTRATE
AGAINST WAR IN GREEN LANES
pic: Simon Hester
Original Leaflet |
 |
 |
  |
 |
 |
  |
 |
 |
250+ RALLY AGAINST WAR IN WOOD GREEN
Biggest anti-war meeting in Haringey yet
Press release
with more pictures
pic: Matt Saywell
Original Leaflet |
 |
 |
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stop
the Blair War Project |
 |
| We
the undersigned oppose any military attack on Iraq by the US and Britain.
The majority of people in this country oppose war, yet their views
are being ignored by the government, so we pledge our support for
protests against this war.” |
|
| Signed
by: Cllr Viv Manheim (Mayor of Haringey, Labour), Cllr Ron Aitken
(Liberal Democrats), Cllr Jonathan Bloch (Liberal Democrats), Cllr
Tom Davidson (Labour), Cllr Matt Davies (Liberal Democrats), Cllr
Isidoros Diakides (Labour), Cllr Bob Hare (Liberal Democrats), Cllr
Brian Millar (Labour), Lucy Craig (Ex-Haringey Labour Cllr 1990-2002),
Keith Flett (Chair, Haringey Trades Union Council), Tariq Ali (writer
and broadcaster), Ros Asquith (author and cartoonist), Joe Ball (Highgate
CND), Manuela Beste (Headteacher, Royal Free Hospital School), Rikki
Blue (musician), Peter Budge (Green Party), Joanna Bornat (senior
lecturer, OU), Laura Butterfield (Chair of Governors, Coldfall School),
Stuart Butterfield (musician), Mike Calvert (Asst Sec, Islington UNISON
LG; Tottenham CLP), Steve Cook, Bob Cottingham (Muswell Hill & Highgate
Pensioners Association), Nick Davidson (documentary film maker), Peter
Draper (Emeritus Consultant in Public Health, Guy’s Hospital), Maria
Duggan (public health policy analyst), Vincent Ebrahim (actor), Friedrich
Ernst (Green Party), Jo Field (NUT, Fortismere School), John Fordham
(Jazz Critic, The Guardian), Andrew Hallifax (record engineer), Simon
Hester (Socialist Alliance), Victoria Hume (arts coordinator for London
hospitals), Sara Kestelman (actor and writer), Olive Kosky (New Politics
Network), Linda Lennard, Liam Maguire (poet and novelist), Rosemary
McCartan (Haringey Defend Council Housing), Eleanor Merton (local
activist), John McKenzie (businessman), Suzanne Nuri (reporter, London
Turkish Gazette), Geoff Palmer (Socialist Alliance), Bill Paterson
(actor), Maureen Paton (author and freelance journalist), Harold Richardson
(Crouch End LP), John Ringham (actor), Prof Harold Rosen (academic),
Anslem Samuel (Socialist Alliance), Juliet Soloman (local activist),
Richard Stein (human rights lawyer), Stephen Taylor (Muswell Hill
Friends of the Earth), Sue Teddern (writer), Sean Wallis (Socialist
Alliance), Howard Williams (musician), Alan Woodward (Defend Our Leisure
Services).
Affiliations listed for identification purposes only. |
|
| To
add your name to the statement, please click here
to send us an email. Please state your name and affiliation. |
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Local
Protests in Haringey on 31 October 2002 included:
| Stroud
Green: 12 noon, Stop the Traffic & the War: corner
of Stroud Green Road & Woodstock Road |
| Crouch
End: Rally by Clock Tower, 1pm |
| Tottenham:
Rally on Tottenham Green, 1pm |
| Wood
Green: Rally outside Main Library, 1pm |
Muswell
Hill: Festival 4-7pm, The Broadway |
|
 |
pictures from day of action |
 |
Muswell
Hill Festival Against the War
4-7pm
The Broadway. Events included:-
| 'Headless
bodies' die-in |
| Pensioners
Against the War demonstration |
| Musical
events, including a Woodcraft Folk choir |
| Candlelit
vigil by Muswell Hill and Highgate CND |
| Teachers
Against the War demonstration |
| Bush
and Blair look-alikes event |
| Mass
write-in of anti-war post cards to Barbara Roche MP |
| Halloween
event to put a spell on the Bush/Blair war plans |
| Multi-faith
anti-war protest |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
War
protest stops traffic, Hornsey Journal, 7 November
2002
Stop the War protesters stopped traffic in Stroud Green Road in a
bid to drive home an anti-violence message. People
campaigning against a possible war with Iraq blocked traffic for 20
minutes in a Hallowe’en protest. They
brought cars to a standstill at the junction of Stroud Green Road
and Woodstock Road. Drivers were left stranded
and protesters handed out leaflets at the peaceful protest. Police
were called to the scene, but campaign organisers say officers showed
sympathy with the protest. Protests were also
held outside the College of North East London in Tottenham; at Crouch
End Clocktower and on Muswell Hill Broadway before the campaigners
headed into central London for a Stop the War rally in Parliament
Square. Lookalikes of President George Bush
and Tony Blair led the protests at Muswell Hill Roundabout, where
there was also a “poodles for peace” demonstration and
music from Haringey Woodcraft Folk. Keith Flett,
from Haringey Stop the War, said: “There is huge local opposition
to a war with Iraq in Haringey and this was shown on October 31. Every
protest reported a welcome from the public.” |
Ham
& High Broadway, 8 November 2002
Anti-war protesters took to the streets of Muswell Hill dressed as
Tony Blair and George Bush on Hallowe’en. Hundreds of residents
turned up to the event in the Broadway in protest at a possible war
with Iraq. Robin Beste from the Muswell Hill
Stop The War group, said: “it was a brilliant evening which
far outstripped our expectations. We started of by running a stall
with just three people in the Broadway and now we have managed to
get more than 3,000 signatures from people in this area alone.” |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
What
we said before the war started |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tony
Blair wants to commit us to a horrific war. An attack on Iraq will kill
thousands of innocent people, devastate a country already reeling from
sanctions and bombing, and further destabilise the Middle East.
Bush’s
oil and war faction admit this isn’t about Saddam’s weapons. When they
talk about “regime change” they mean replacing him with another
dictatorship. The US has never permitted democratic government in Iraq
since the CIA-backed coup in the 1950s that gave Saddam power, and they
will not risk losing control now. Democracy in Iraq would undermine the
jigsaw puzzle of competing dictators sitting on the oil fields and raise
demands to tax the oil companies to reconstruct elementary health, education
and infrastructure bombed and sanctioned out of existence.
If
you doubt this claim, just compare the promises made before previous wars
and their outcome. Before the Afghan war the US pledged huge funds for
reconstruction. But as the war machine moves on, devatation is in its
wake. At the Tokyo Conference in January, less than 0.5% of the
cost of the military campaign was promised to Afghanistan for reconstruction!
Contrast the US treatment of Israel (which has as many independent nuclear
warheads as Britain) and Iraq (with none).
In George Bush’s war, it will be the ordinary people of Iraq
that suffer, not Saddam. As in Afghanistan and the last Gulf War,
the US will bomb massively from a great height before putting a single
soldier on the ground. They have a huge armoury of usable “theatre”
weapons of mass destruction. Thermobaric bombs, fuel air explosives, “daisy
cutters” and depleted uranium warheads.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
There
is no heroism in bombing innocent civilians. So many people, especially
politicians, seemed so keen to get angry on our behalf. It seemed
the only people not in rage were the families of the victims. We had
too much grief to cope with for that” - Rita Lasar, whose brother
was killed in the World Trade Centre on September 11th 2001 Peaceful
Tomorrows website
More quotes
Contributed
articles |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
There
is really nothing to be said for an invasion of Iraq. Saddam Hussein
could be replaced by someone equally hideous whose name is not Saddam
Hussein. It is the name Saddam that haunts the US administration,
not his policies - Said Aburish, leading Arab journalist
and author |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
British
troops will be only a fig leaf for this slaughter. It will be George Bush
and the US military who decide who to kill, what bombs to drop, how the war
starts and how it ends. Tony Blair’s policy of appeasement promises a
restraint that he can’t deliver. We refuse to pay a blood price for a
bloody oil war.
Similarly,
many people want the UN to restrain the US because they trust neither Blair
nor Bush. But we should point out that fuel air explosives (conventional weapons
with the ferocity of a nuclear bomb minus the radioactivity) with a UN logo
stamped on the side will kill just as indiscriminately as those emblazoned with
the Stars and Stripes.
The
majority of British people are against Bush and Blair’s war drive.
The demonstration on Saturday 28 September 2002 was the largest ever held in
Britain against any war. It was FOUR times bigger than the 100,000-strong demonstrations
at the height of the Vietnam war, or the demos last year against the Afghan
war. Not only was it massive, it was supported by 12 national trade unions,
people of many religions and of none. As can be seen from the photographs
it was also the most diverse and multi-racial demonstration that Britain has
ever seen. This simple fact repudiates the lazy argument that opposition to
the actions of the Israeli military means anti-semitism, or, as Scott Ritter
testifies, that opposition to the US war on Iraq equals anti-americanism.
The
size of that demonstration is testament to all the hard work of thousands
of ordinary people who became activists through witnessing the horror and hypocrisy
of the “war on terror”. We owe each other a huge debt, but we now
have a massive responsibility on our shoulders.
Tony
Blair wants carte blanche to go to war behind the US, despite massive opposition
in the ranks of his own party and the trade unions. The Stop the War Coalition
is now urging everyone opposed to the war to stand up for peace. On 31st October
we organised local protests and demonstrations across Haringey (see above).
The
next major national demonstration is in Central London on 15 February 2003. On
that day there will be demonstrations across Europe, in New York, and hopefully
elsewhere.
The world-wide anti-war movement is growing. US Secretary of State Madeline
Albright recently ordered a survey of 44 countries which showed overwhelming opposition
to war (for example, in Russia, 79% oppose war, Germany,
71%, Turkey, 83%). Only 10% of US citizens, according
to the PBS network, would support a war where the US ‘goes it alone’.
Bush has been forced to delay because he is worried about domestic political opinion.
Support for the war in the US is broad, but shallow. Around the
world we have to get the message across that this war is wrong, by uniting all
those who oppose this war and mobilising this passive opposition into an active
movement for peace.
If
you want to be kept informed, please join
our email list. Get in touch with us and we will put you in contact with
other local people who are campaigning against the war. Put a poster
in your window and get your friends, neighbours and workmates to do the same.
Ask them to sign the national CND/STWC petition.
We are
winning the argument - now let’s win the peace.
 |
 |
 |
 |
What
we said about the US war drive in 2002 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
George Bush spelled out
the new targets of his war on terrorism in his State of the Union
address at the beginning of 2002. After devastating Afghanistan and killing many
more civilians than died on September 11th 2001, he has explicitly targetted Somalia,
Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Meanwhile, US troops have entered the Phillipines,
Columbia and Georgia. It is an open secret that the US gave the go-ahead to the
failed coup in Venezuela.
The
basic case of the peace movement is that the ‘war on terrorism’ is immoral
and counterproductive to its alleged aims (see above and below).
To
put it bluntly: if US bombing and invasion was such a success in the past,
why is Bush so keen to rerun the wars of the last century?
Hence, much of the administrations recent rhetoric has shifted onto
the so-called axis of evil - an even more flexible doctrine,
unconstrained by minor difficulties like whether it will actually work.
But can Bush be trusted to know what evil is, when ex-enemies become allies,
and ex-allies, enemies?
For
Bush, evil simply brackets the current set of rogue
states: strategic or simply inconvenient competitors to US interests.
Taken on face value, the policy is based on a startling ignorance
of the political and religious history of the Middle East.
-
Iraq and Iran in the same axis? This would
be an historic if unlikely diplomatic achievement - given the 1
million dead from the eight-year Iran-Iraq war and continuing animosity
since - never mind centuries of religious rivalries and regional
disputes.
- Saddam
and Osama Bin Laden in the same axis? Bin Laden's stated
aims include the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
There
is no indication, no proof that Iraq is involved in terrorism. This
terror argument cannot be used to legitimise old enemies - German
government spokesperson
The best, and in some cases, the only, defence is a good offence
- Donald Rumsfeld
US policy is that, regardless of what the inspectors do, the
people of Iraq would be better off with a different regime in Baghdad.
- Colin Powell
This is a period of enormous opportunity, a period akin to 1945-7,
to create a new balance of power. - Condoleezza Rice |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Given all of this, where is the voice of restraint from Tony Blair? What
happened to Blair’s promise to restrain Bush from targets other than Afghanistan?
Tony Blair appeased Bush over Afghanistan. Now he is Bush’s No. 1 ally in
Europe, his recruiting seargent for war on Iraq.
The US claims
that an attack on Iraq is justified by Iraqs possible ownership of weapons
of mass destruction. The ex-UNSCOM arms inspector, Scott Ritter, ex-Marine
and, in his own words, "patriotic American", says that Iraq is completely
disarmed and the US has presented no evidence whatsoever to support their argument.
Perhaps it is unsurprising that the US administration sees no reason to present
any evidence to support this claim. Little things like facts must not get away
with a war Bush just has to fight. Nor is Iraqs agreement for inspection
sufficient to avert slaughter.
Of course, all of this
is total hypocrisy. The
US put Saddam Hussein in power and armed him. Britain
and the US continued to arm him, turning a blind eye when he slaughtered Kurds
in Halabja in 1983, throughout the 8 years of the Iran-Iraq war, where over a
million people died, and the aftermath of that war. The US has nuclear, chemical
and biological weapons. And the US refuses inspection of its weapons sites by
any other power, including the UN.
An
attack on Iraq would mean tens of thousands more slaughtered civilians
and conscripts, would
generate more hatred of the West, and have unknown consequences across the Middle
East and the world. It is a gamble for control of Middle Eastern oil with the
future of the world at stake.
The US has
declared its intentions, but it wont be easy for them. Bush has to reassemble
his international coalition of warmongers, and they are beginning
to express the doubt that they may not be able to invade Iraq and leave the map
of the Middle East intact. They hope that ordinary people around the world, and
especially in the Middle East and the US, do not protest in large numbers. But
the clock is ticking. There will be a national demonstration against the prospect
of war with Iraq on 15 February (see above). We have to keep
up the pressure. Download the national
DON'T ATTACK IRAQ CND/STWC petition (66K PDF) and take it around
your friends, family and workmates. For more campaigning ideas, see here.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Why
we call for freedom for Palestine |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The terrible carnage
in Israel and Palestine demonstrates that a “war on terrorism” can only be futile.
This war is a grossly unequal fight between tanks and refugees. It is a disaster
for Palestinians and a tragedy for Israelis. But does George Bush want peace?
The US war drive, coupled with its blind-eye policy on Israel, only encourages
the warmongers in the Israeli government. Ariel Sharon takes his cue from Bush.
Bush’s war drive is a fraud.
| We
have consistently argued that this entire war policy is counterproductive
and immoral (see below). This can be clearly seen
in the case of Israel. Every repressive move against the Palestinians over
the last 50 years has resulted in more terrorist attacks. The tragic reality
is that the Palestinians have nowhere else to turn. The responsibility is
on the governments of Israel and the US (and, by extension, Britain) to
stop this war. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
To
[take action against Iraq] would unite the whole Muslim world against
the US [and] the coalition against terrorism would disintegrate” - Gerald
Kaufman MP, 17 April 2002 Guardian
report |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The US could
stop Israel today. The Israeli economy depends on the $3.5 billion a year
it gets from the US. Bush could force Sharon to stop the war and negotiate by
threatening to pull the plug. Instead, when the violence was at its greatest in
March, Colin Powell studiously spent a week avoiding going to Israel. The signal
is tragically all too clear: play for time and let the slaughter continue.
Bush and Blair are worried about one thing only:
that their hypocrisy over Israel will expose their real war aims in
Iraq and elsewhere. If this is not a war against “terror”, what is it
for? The Israel/Palestine conflict points to an age-old reason: OIL
and POWER.
But protests get results. Our government is split over attacking
Iraq, and Blair is on the defensive. 70% of people in the UK say they are
opposed to war on Iraq. The more people who demonstrate against the US war
drive and in solidarity with the Palestinians, the more we can keep up the
pressure for peace.
We applaud the action of those Israelis, including 385 IDF reservists,
who are speaking out for peace. We are deeply indebted to those international
peace activists who are putting their lives on the line in Palestine. The
best thing we can do to help them is to build the peace movement here in
the UK. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
[F]ive Palestinian Authority policemen [were] disarmed and then
shot dead in the street in Ramallah in cold blood, and just a couple
of days later a similar fate awaited another thirty: lined up, blindfolded
and then all machine-gunned to death from a nearby Merkava tank...
[N]either of these incidents was ever reported in our mainstream media.
- Ted Curtis, International observer and peace activist, witnessing
the IDF in Bethlehem in 2002 Full
article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
I
feel I must encourage people to view the news not just in terms of headlines
in ink, not just in terms of stories on TV and radio but also in the context
of people whose only crime is to be at the wrong place at the wrong time,
and whose offence is no greater than that of children huddling in fear in
the basements of hospitals.” - Suhail Shafi, Maltese doctor, who was
6 years old when the US bombed Tripoli in 1986 Full
article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
WHAT
ARE THE RESULTS OF THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN? |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Having devastated Afghanistan, the US has now handed it over to rival warlords.
In the West, we are supposed to cheer a great victory achieved by overwhelming
force against a poverty-stricken country and its people. Meanwhile bombing continues,
away from the cameras and front pages. Donald Rumsfeld now says that bombing will
continue at least until the summer of 2002.
What
kind of victory is this?
The world is a much more dangerous place. Afghan
society has been bombed to ruins and is even more dependent on the gun.
India and Russia are looking at how the war can be used to their strategic
advantage. The US, bolstered by its “hit and run” victory, feels confident
to rip up the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty and talk up the prospect of
invading Iraq. Palestine is in flames. Meanwhile, under the pretext of fighting
terrorism, Blunkett and Blair have given themselves the right to indefinitely
jail anyone without trial.
From the beginning of the war, we argued
that a war against terrorism was counterproductive, immoral
and that we would have to pay for it. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
...The
American media have declared victory in Afghanistan. Another lie.
Hamid Karzai’s government controls only a few Kabul streets. Afghanistan
is a place of anarchy and lawlessness, of rape and brigandage after
America’s war. One of Mr. Karzai’s own ministers is murdered at the
Bagram air base in an inter-cabinet feud.” - Robert Fisk, Britain’s
leading expert on Middle Eastern affairs in The Independent
21/2/2002 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| 1. |
|
The
“war against terrorism” is fundamentally counterproductive. It makes
terrorism more likely. This
is not a question of the guilt or innocence of Bin Laden. Bombs
and hijackings are weapons of the weak, not the powerful. War causes massive
instability for a number of reasons, not least because millions see their
dictators supporting a war against people like them. Thus Russia, China,
Indonesia and Israel call their opponents terrorists to justify
repression.
The US is relying on bombing from a great height and using proxy forces
regardless of their record on human rights. The war is legitimating violence
and destabilising entire regions of the world. Everywhere the same question
is asked: who will be next?
|
| 2. |
|
The
war is immoral. The richest countries in the world are fighting the
poorest. First Afghanistan, now the US wants to target Iraq and Somalia,
both countries that have been utterly devastated by war. Yesterdays
despots, like Putin and Musharraf, are todays allies.
We now know that, on US army figures, more innocent civilians have died
from being directly bombed than died on September 11th 2001. How is
this justice? How does this honour the dead?
We do not choose sides between one armed gang and another. We say something
quite different. The only way of ending the cycle of violence, poverty
and starvation is to flood these countries with humanitarian aid, without
strings, without weapons, and without troops. And, if refugees should flee,
we welcome them. Humanitarianism is not selective or conditional.
|
| 3. |
|
We
are paying for this war. George Bush has earmarked $40 billion for his
war on terror and he says more funds will be released as required.
He has said that coalition partners will be expected to pay for his ongoing
war, as well as providing material assistance and troops. Meanwhile, in
the UK, we face mounting job losses, an NHS that can't cope with a flu
epidemic, never mind anthrax, major attacks on our civil liberties, and
the threat of a racist backlash licenced by the insane logic of the war.
We owe it to ourselves to speak out. |
Their war has not gone unopposed. In every corner of the world, and
from Haringey to Berkley, people have come together to oppose the US’s “war
on terrorism”. In a few months the anti-war movement became millions-b.
Last year we saw two massive demonstrations in Central London, with 50,000
and 100,000 people on them. In September 2002, 400,000
united for peace and justice, in the biggest anti-war demonstration in British
history. In Florence, up to 1 million people from across
Europe demonstrated against war on Iraq.
What we do can make a difference, if we all unite for peace. We said
last year that if the 30% of people who have consistently opposed the war
in the UK stand up, speak up and protest, we can pull the middle 60% into
opposing the war and force New Labour and Tony Blair to think again. This
will also encourage many more US citizens to come out openly against the
war. This is now happening.
We are winning the argument. A
Guardian/ICM poll in March found that 51% of people opposed extending
the war to Iraq. Blair is increasingly isolated in his own party. We have
to keep up the pressure. Now the figure is well over 70% despite all their
propoganda.
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
We
say: Stop this war drive
Recall ground troops from Afghanistan
Send aid and drop the debt
Defend our civil rights and no to racism |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Demonstrate
outside Downing Street at 6pm if they bomb again. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
WHAT
NOW IN AFGHANISTAN?
WHY GROUND TROOPS ARE WRONG
WE SHOULD AIRLIFT AID |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Even before the recent war,
Afghanistan was in a terrible state. Crippled by a quarter century of continuous
war, a country the size of France had 7 million starving people. A limited aid
effort was beginning to get some aid to these people.
It
is hard to assess the damage of the war. What we do know is not encouraging.
Millions have been displaced. Thousands have been killed by the bombs. Cities
are in ruins. Refugees are starving in border camps. Away from our TV screens,
in isolated mountain passes, aid agencies believe that many hundreds of
thousands have been starving and freezing to death. The first task of the
West should have been to feed and clothe these people so that they could
survive the winter. The Red Cross needs helicopters to airlift food to the
mountains. Where is the aid effort to match the war effort?
There
may not be much food in Afghanistan. But there is one thing that Afghanistan
has plenty of. Guns. Continuous guerilla war and economic isolation means
the rule of the bandit. Those left alive loot the cities to survive. The
Taliban were brutal, but they were only the latest in a long line of brutal
warlords. If Afghanistan is going to move forward, if women's position in
society is going to be improved, then more than bombs and platitudes are
needed.
In this situation, only aid and development can break the hold of the warlords.
It is worth repeating: the only way of ending the cycle of violence,
poverty and starvation is to flood the country with humanitarian aid, without
strings, without weapons, and without troops. Refugees should be allowed
to flee to safety.
Even sending supposedly neutral ground troops would be counterproductive.
It is easy to commit troops to a warzone; it is far harder to get them out.
At best, the presence of troops becomes a focus for warring factions, as
in the case of Macedonia. Rival groups will try to get the troops to intervene
on their side. But Western soldiers in Afghanistan are far from neutral.
The central questions are, simply: what are their orders, and which way
will they jump if pushed? |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
A
European demining expert in Kabul who works closely with the Pentagon
reckons that up to 8,000 civilians have been killed ... Professor
Marc Herold, of the University of New Hampshire, puts the number of
civilian casualties at at least 4,000” - The Guardian,
February 12th, 2002
“This has been the most accurate war ever fought in this nation’s
history” - General Tommy Franks, US Afghan campaign commander
“In fact, [the rate of civilians killed per bomb dropped] was far
higher in the Afghanistan conflict - perhaps four times higher -
than in the 1999 Balkans war” - Carl Conetta, Commonwealth Institute
“What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties - 3,767
civilian deaths in eight and a half weeks? ... The critical element
remains the very low value put upon Afghan civilian lives by US military
planners... as clearly revealed by US willingness to bomb heavily
populated regions” - Professor Marc Herold, University of New
Hampshire, in the first major study of Afghan casualties |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Before Britain sent troops, we argued that George Bush wanted them to participate
in a “policing role” and a hunt for Bin Laden. This was a recipe for committing
soldiers to two highly problematic tasks: to keep
Northern Alliance factions apart and to pursue a ground war against the remnants
of the Taliban.
We have now seen what the second of these means. An intensification of the bombing,
plus massacres supported by our governments. But even the first task will create
more problems than it will solve. That is why we argue that the West should give
aid without strings and without troops.
| |
 |
| The Spray-on Haringey banner in Trafalgar Square, 13/10/2001.
Pic: Vaughan
Melzer. |
We have to get organised
now to stop this war on terrorism. 100,000 people demonstrated
in Central London on the 18th November last year, despite the fact that the
media kept trying to convince us that the war was over. 100,000 more demonstrated
in solidarity with the Palestinians in April, in a fantastic, overwhelmingly
Asian, demonstration almost entirely ignored by the British press. Similar numbers
have demonstrated in the USA. The world-wide anti-war movement is growing. We
are winning the arguments as our rulers wars unravel.
Geoff Hoon and Jack Straw said at the end of 2001 that Britain would support
the US in attacking Iraq, while Britain sent troops into the quagmire created
by the war in Afghanistan. This policy is appeasing the hawks in the US government.
Tony Blairs hand of restraint is in fact a thumbs-up for whatever
George Bush wants. Bush now says that any state he declares is in the axis
of evil is a legitimate target. These people want to be able to bomb unilaterally
and use the UN as a flag of convenience to sort out the resulting mess. Unfortunately
we cannot rely on the UN to stop Bush. GW Bush can bully the United Nations
into giving them a green light for war, just as his father did in the last US-Iraq
war.
What really counts is what we - ordinary people - do. We have to keep up
the pressure. We appeal to all like-minded individuals and organisations to
join together to continue to build a powerful peace movement that can extend
a hand of friendship to the poor of the world and isolate the war-mongers.
For campaigning and letter-writing ideas, see this page.
Gallery! See where weve been, out and
about campaigning in Haringey.
 |
 |
 |
 |
GET
ACTIVE! JOIN THE haringey@stopwar
MAILING
LIST |
 |
 |
 |
 |
If
you live or work in Haringey and want to help out, please get in touch. Email
us and we will add you to our regular mailing list. Bookmark this page in
your browser and this site will grow as we get organised. The address is haringey@stopwar.org.uk.
Window posters for download
(PDF):
 |
 |
 |
 |
LOCAL
GROUPS: NEW & GROWING! |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Haringey
Council Workers Against the War: if you work for Haringey Council, we
want to hear from you! In
our jobs, council workers deal with the social consequences of the war: cuts,
refugees and racism. Like many other workers, we have to take a stand against
this war.
(email) Labour Against the War:
for members of the Labour Party opposed to the war.
You can also write to LATW, PO Box 2378, London E5 9QU.
Note: If you want to set up a local group or one based around a particular workplace,
club, etc., in Haringey (e.g., Haringey Teachers..., Schoolkids...), then
email us with your suggestions.
We can help you set up a web page, advertise your group on the haringey@stopwar
email list and otherwise give you support to get your group established. Look
at the Council Workers page to get the general idea.
Stop
the War Coalition: National Stop the War website
Media Workers Against the War:
Silence-breaking media workers website with a huge archive of articles
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament:
The UKs most well-known and best-respected campaign for peace and nuclear
disarmament
Courage to Refuse:
Site for supporters of Israeli Defence Force conscientious objectors (see also
the Combatant's Letter)
Palestinian Solidarity
Campaign: Campaigning for justice for the Palestinians
Peaceful Tomorrows:
September 11th survivors site for peace and justice
Znet
Magazine: US-based alternative media site with massive archive of anti-war
articles and more
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
STOP
THIS WAR |
 |
|
 |
STOP
THE RACIST BACKLASH |
 |
|
 |
DEFEND
CIVIL RIGHTS |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Email
the webmaster with any suggestions or criticisms about this page.